top of page
  • Del Rio


An intricate language model known as OpenAI created ChatGPT to interact with people naturally and human-likely. It was launched as a demo version at the end of November 2022. ChatGPT can help with various tasks thanks to its sophisticated natural language processing abilities, from responding to general knowledge inquiries to making customised suggestions. Its objective is to provide accurate and pertinent data conversationally, improving its accessibility and assisting people in performing their tasks more effectively (Lund, 2023). In January 2023, the total number of visits to ChatGPT was 619 million, which jumped to 1 billion in February 2023 (King, 2023). Daily, the website records 25 million visitors. In terms of underlying techniques, ChatGPT could be more innovative. It's nothing revolutionary, although that is how it is perceived in the public. It is just that, you know, it is well put together; it is nicely done.

ChatGPT is just a chatbot that puts all the required answers together for the people, which can also be found on Google or Microsoft. However, the big difference is that it arranges the solutions in an organised and preferable way. It tries to put everything as we want. This interactive method made ChatGPT famous and worth the hype. It is an affordable option for companies and educational institutions because it is open-source and accessible to everyone. Here, the ability of Chat GPT to produce results rapidly is one of its main advantages. Indeed, for jobs that need to be finished quickly, using ChatGPT can be pretty helpful (Liebrenz, 2023). You can complete your duties in a fraction of the time it would have taken you to do them manually. In addition, it can automate arduous tasks like data entry or categorisation, freeing up your team's time for more crucial work. It can also be used to create ideas and content (McGee, 2023). Thus, this technology enables chatbots to comprehend client inquiries precisely and offer thorough responses in almost real-time. Again, Language models like ChatGPT, when used as a supplement to learn rather than as a substitute for it, can aid students in developing their writing and speaking abilities.


Like a coin, every innovation has some positive sides as well as some negative impacts. Using ChatGPT has some disadvantages (Liebrenz, 2023). Such as, ChatGPT can produce content quickly and accurately on simple subjects but needs help with more challenging concepts or problems. Again, users must remember that Chat GPT is still developing and cannot generate flawless results. Despite having learning capabilities that can be helpful, this also means that the tool might only sometimes produce the most accurate or suitable results (Thorp, 2023). The content's lack of dependability could result in mistakes or misconceptions, harming the user experience.

Moreover, students might abuse the tool by utilizing the GPT-3 technology to complete assignments without fully comprehending the ideas or problem-solving techniques involved. This may result in an over-dependency on technology and a deficiency in problem-solving and critical reasoning abilities (McGee, 2023)

. On the other hand, Research integrity may be compromised if GPT-3 technology is misused by researchers who fabricate or alter data. This could have severe repercussions for both the individual researcher and the larger scientific and research community.

The ethical and responsible use of these tools in our educational system's curricula must be monitored for their effects on students' growth and learning. Strict ethical standards must be adopted for research, addressing biases and adverse impact in the technology's outputs, addressing the possibility of malicious use, and describing safeguards against such. Strict ethical standards and guidelines must be implemented to prevent academics from abusing GPT-3 technology (King, 2023). These standards and guidelines must also forbid data manipulation and fabrication. Researchers should be required to participate in even more rigorous peer review and collaboration to ensure their work is transparent, precise, and reliable.

Identifying ChatGPT's blind spots and determining how it might be abused for harmful purposes are probably significant factors in why OpenAI made the bot available for trial to the general public (Thorp, 2023). These flaws will likely be fixed in upcoming releases, along with any additional solutions that might exist but have yet to be found.


King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1-2.

Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105-e106.

Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library Hi Tech News.

McGee, R. W. (2023). Annie Chan: Three Short Stories Written with Chat GPT. Available at SSRN 4359403.

Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313.

ChatGPT Statistics 2023<span>All the latest statistics about OpenAI’s chatbot</span>

41 views0 comments


bottom of page